Skip to main content.

mild Key Data Quick Reference Guide
IVS-MILD-STUD-1476551_REV-0


Revision Date: 11.26.24

  1. Hansson T, Suzuki N, Hebelka H, Gaulitz A. The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum. Eur Spine J. 2009 May;18(5):679-86. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0919-7. Epub 2009 Mar 11. PMID: 19277726; PMCID: PMC3234003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234003/.
  2. Staats PS, Chafin TB, Golovac S, et al. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):789-794. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000868.
  3. Deer TR, Chafin TB, Costandi SJ, et al. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Pract. 2024;24(1):109-119. doi:10.1111/papr.13293.
  4. Mekhail N, Costandi S, Nageeb G, Ekladios C, Saied O. The durability of minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up. Pain Pract. 2021;21(8):826-835. doi:10.1111/papr.13020.
  5. Mekhail N, Costandi S, Abraham B, Samuel SW. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression. Pain Pract. 2012 Jul;12(6):417-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00565.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1. PMID: 22651852. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00565.x.
  6. Jain S, Deer T, Sayed D, Chopra P, Wahezi S, Jassal N, Weisbein J, Jameson J, Malinowski M, Golovac S. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety. Pain Manag. 2020 Sep;10(5):331-348. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0037. Epub 2020 Jul 1. PMID: 32609052. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2217/pmt-2020-0037#d1e525.
  7. Deer T, Kim C, Wahezi SE, Qu H, Sayed D; MOTION Study Investigators. Objective Real-World Outcomes of Patients Suffering from Painful Neurogenic Claudication Treated with the mild® Procedure: Interim 6-Month Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 10;14:1687-1697. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S312573. PMID: 34140805; PMCID: PMC8203201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203201/.
  8. Pryzbylkowski, P., Bux, A., Chandwani, K., Khemlani, V., Puri, S., Rosenberg, J., & Sukumaran, H. (2021). Understanding Whether Chronic Lower back Pain Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Benefit from Multiple Epidural Steroid Injections Prior to the Mild® Procedure. Pain Management, 12(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2021-0093.
  9. Udeh BL, CostandiS , DaltonJE , GhoshR , YousefH , MekhailN. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients. Pain Pract.15(2), 107–116 (2015).
  10. Deer TR, Grider JS, Pope JE, et al. Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). J Pain Res. 2022;15:1325-1354. Published 2022 May 5. doi:10.2147/JPR.S355285.